OK so she has a heart break rags to robe story, big freaking deal and I don’t care if she is Hispanic or a women or even both, she is a bad pick. Why you ask? Well I’ll tell you…
Sonia Sotomayor Memo
Memorandum
TO: JCN Members and Interested Parties
FROM: Wendy Long, Counsel to JCN
DATE: May 26, 2009
RE: Obama Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor• President Obama has threatened to nominate liberal judicial activists who will indulge their left-wing policy preferences instead of neutrally applying the law. In selecting Judge Sonia Sotomayor as his
Supreme Court nominee, President Obama has carried out his threat.• Judge Sotomayor will allow her feelings and personal politics to stand in the way of basic fairness. In a recent case, Ricci v. DeStefano, Sotomayor sided with a city that used racially discriminatory practices to deny promotions to firefighters. The per curiam opinion Sotomayor joined went so far out of its way to bury the firefighters’ important claims of unfair treatment that her colleague, Judge Jose Cabranes, a Clinton appointee, chastised her.
o According to Judge Cabranes, Sotomayor’s opinion “contains no reference whatsoever to the constitutional claims at he core of this case” and its “perfunctory disposition rests uneasily with the weighty issues presented by this appeal.” Even the liberal Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen expressed disappointment with the case, stating, “Ricci is not just a legal case but a man who has been
deprived of the pursuit of happiness on account of race.”o Sotomayor’s terrible decision in Ricci is under review by the Supreme Court and an opinion is expected by the end of June.
• Sotomayor readily admits that she applies her feelings and personal politics when deciding cases. In a 2002 speech at Berkeley, she stated that she believes it is appropriate for a judge to consider
their “experiences as women and people of color,” which she believes should “affect our decisions.” She went on to say in that same speech “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her
experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.” She reiterated her commitment to that lawless judicial philosophy at Duke Law School in 2005 when she stated that the “Court of Appeals is where policy is made.”• The poor quality of Sotomayor’s decisions is reflected in her terrible record of reversals by the Supreme Court.
• Sotomayor is a favorite of far left special interest groups. In addition to her record as a hard left judicial activist, Sotomayor has been recommended for the Supreme Court by Nan Aron of the very liberal Alliance for Justice, who stated in a 2004 memo to the Senate Judiciary Committee that Sotomayor had “been through an initial vetting and fit into the criteria that we believe should be the
standard for any Supreme Court justice.”• The White House is sure to argue that Sotomayor is a “bipartisan pick” because Bush 41 appointed her to the district court: President George H.W. Bush nominated Sotomayor in 1991 only because the New York senators had forced on the White House a deal that enabled Senator Moynihan to name one of every four district court nominees in New York. In 1998, 29 Republican senators voted against President Clinton’s nomination of Sotomayor to the Second Circuit.
Remember this is the women that thinks Judges make the law not just interprete them she thinks race and gender matters when interrupting those laws and she been reverses 6 out of 7 times challenged. She has ruled in favor of emanate domain to make way for a Walgreens.
A Sotomayor quotes…
All of the legal defense funds out there, they’re looking for people with Court of Appeals experience because it is — Court of Appeals is where policy is made. And I know, and I know this is on tape, and I should never say that because we don’t make law, I know. (laughing) Okay, I know. I know. I’m not promoting it and I’m not advocating it. I’m — you know. (laughing)
Wrong and to believe that and perform that is a violation of the US Constitution.
She was part of a panel that rejected the challenge brought by white firefighters who scored high but were denied promotion. Frank Ricci, the lead plaintiff, argued that it was unfair he was denied promotion after he had studied intensively for the exam and even paid for special coaching to overcome his dyslexia.
This was the case where several people took a firefighter advancement test and the whites passed the test, so they threw out the test since because no Blacks passed it. They didn’t say they couldn’t pass the test, they just didn’t… guess those evil White folks heard of this secret thing called studying.
Which reminds me of a story about those evil white people trying to hold the back/brown man down. Guess Sotomayor would agree…
No Rakim we want you to get a head and pay taxes and get out of our pockets, but I digress…
Anyway more on Sotomayor here…
Michelle Malkin – SCOTUS pick: Sonia Sotomayor
Rush Limbaugh – GOP Must Go to Mat on Sotomayor to Tell Real Story of Barack Obama
Tweet
Buzz
DIGG
Facebook
Ping
Reddit
Stumble
Related posts:
- Sotomayor reversed AGAIN!
- Sotomayor blah, blah, blah
- Which part of “Supreme” does Obama not understand?
- Obama lies about Supreme Court ruling
- The Church of Global Warming and why it’s good.
- Misspoken or what I like to call lies.
- Congress exempt from National Health Care Plan
- In the last week…
- So we’re going to try KSM in a civilian court… anyone remember June 1942?
- US falls in Public educations… but Obama still believes he can run health care better.



[...] Sonia Sotomayor uh NO The Angry White Guy Posted by root 3 hours ago (http://davart.net) She went on to say in that same speech i would hope that a wise latina woman with the colin powell i am still a republican middot why you 39 re fat middot do what bry awg i just comment on the same post to share my opinion more than once powered by wordpr Discuss | Bury | News | Sonia Sotomayor uh NO The Angry White Guy [...]